The
United States Army said that even under the best conditions recognizing Filipino guerillas at the end of World War II proved difficult, raising doubts about the accuracy of their records, and aging veterans here and in the Philippines
appear to be paying the price for it today.
The
Philippines
and US mark the 70th anniversary of the Fall of Bataan tomorrow
(April 9). It is remembered as the “Araw ng Kagitingan” (Day of Valor) as
76,000 Filipino and American soldiers shared both the ignominy of defeat as
well as the horrors of the 90-mile Death March.
But
many were able to escape, melt into the mountains and launch one of the most
potent guerilla campaigns in the Pacific War.
Today,
thousands of aging Filipino World War II veterans are still fighting to get the
benefits that were deprived by the 1946 Rescission Act. Many claims for
benefits under the Filipino Veterans Equity Compensation (FVEC) fund have been
rejected because the US
can’t or will not authenticate their service during World War II.
Last
year, President Obama authorized the previously classified report “US Army
Recognition of Philippine Guerillas” to be made public in the hopes those
Filipino WWII veterans will find some document that could help them qualify for
the benefit.
I’m
not sure how helpful the report is for Filipino veterans – some advocates attest
to it – but it offers an interesting snapshot of the US-run Philippine
Commonwealth at the end of World War II.
After
repeated acts of valor, members of the Philippine Scout, USAFFE forces and
guerillas who fought under US
military command for most of World War II settled back to a life in a nation
devastated by conflict and years of brutal occupation.
Leaders
from President Franklin D. Roosevelt to Gen. Douglas MacArthur promised to
rebuild the country and pay back the heroic exploits of Filipino fighters. But
much of that turned out to be hollow.
The
US
began the process of recognizing Filipino guerillas but faced immense
challenges. “Under the most favorable reception the granting of guerilla
recognition to deserving Filipinos would have been extremely difficult to
accomplish,” the report admitted.
They
were hobbled by insufficient manpower, the post-war politics leading up to the
granting of Philippine independence in 1946, and corruption so insidious the
report suggested some guerilla organizations acted more like the Mafia.
American
officers were under significant pressure from repeated deadlines and suspicion
that erstwhile Japanese collaborators had managed to get their names in the
guerilla roster they were trying to build.
This
was compounded by the fog of war. Most collaborators served with the Kempeitai,
the Japanese equivalent of the German SS. But sometimes personal animosities
and tactical exigencies bred disasters as when a suspected supporter of the
Hukbalahap – perhaps the fiercest anti-Japanese fighting unit in Luzon –
betrayed Lt. Col. Claude Thorp, allegedly because they refused to be placed
under US
military command.
“Throughout
the rest of the Occupation a state of warfare existed between the Huks and the
USAFFE guerillas with the Huks attempting to expand and the USAFFE guerillas
attempting to contain them in Pampanga.” Thorp was captured on his way to
negotiate a truce with Huk commanders and was executed by the Japanese in
October 1942.
“As
benefits flowed, the desire to receive such benefits prompted hundreds of
thousands of Filipinos to seek recognition as guerillas. An additional reason
for desiring recognition…was to cloak collaborationist activities. On the
surface, the fact of recognition was prime facie evidence of loyalty to the
Commonwealth and the United
States and would be difficult to overcome in
the People’s Court.”
“Highly
placed” Filipinos in the government or the Philippine Army – former guerillas
or not – “sought to use their personal positions to influence the recognition
of personal friends or potentially politically powerful guerilla
organizations.”
The
Americans became so concerned with leaks that they allowed critical manpower
shortages to fester rather than recruit additional Filipinos to fill the
vacancies.
“In
all fairness to these (Filipino) employees, the majority of whom were extremely
loyal and devoted to their duties, it should be pointed out and not
underemphasized that certain guerilla units have employed ruthless means in
obtaining their ends and may have forced some employees to furnish the
information desired under threat of violence to themselves or to their
families.”
The
report said some tried to bribe officers “ranging into hundreds of thousands of
pesos, by extending such commercial advantages as lumber or mining
concessions…furnishing investigating officers with their own homes, automobiles
and women, or by throwing huge parties.”
When
they couldn’t get what they wanted with honey, some tried intimidation. It became
so serious the report said “many direct and indirect threats” were made against
American officers and personnel.
And
the alleged attempts to defraud were not limited to Filipinos.
“A
number of former American military and naval officers who had served with
guerillas or had been connected with them during the course of the Occupation
and Liberation, now engaged in private business in the Philippines, have
consistently submitted recommendations in favor of their own guerillas. In some
cases, these recommendations have not been questioned…In other cases, certain
individuals have consistently submitted recommendations which were later
determined to have been not based upon facts.”
“In
spite of all care exercised a few units slipped through and received
recognition.” Still by the time the process was completed, only about 10
percent of the nearly 1.3 million claims filed were actually approved.
All
this appear to cast a question about the propriety of rejecting the claims of
Filipino veterans on the ground that their names can’t be found in these “official”
records.
No comments:
Post a Comment